4.7 Article

Quantification of exploitable shallow geothermal energy by using Borehole Heat Exchanger coupled Ground Source Heat Pump systems

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 80-89

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.097

Keywords

Shallow geothermal potential; Borehole heat exchanger (BHE); Ground source heat pump (GSHP); OpenGeoSys (OGS)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41628203]
  2. Helmholtz Association
  3. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [03FH059PX3, 03EK3022B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In previous studies, the amount of exploitable shallow geothermal energy was estimated by assuming a uniform temperature drop of 2-6 degrees C in the aquifer. In this work, a more comprehensive numerical model has been employed to evaluate the available amount of shallow geothermal energy by using Borehole Heat Exchanger coupled Ground Source Heat Pump systems. Numerical experiments have been performed by simulating the long-term evolution of the subsurface temperature field, which is subject to the operation of borehole heat exchangers and varying parameters like subsurface thermal conductivity and groundwater flow velocity. The concept of equivalent temperature drop is proposed as an auxiliary quantity for the subsurface. With the help of this parameter, a procedure has been established to quantify the amount of shallow geothermal potential. Following this approach, a realistic equivalent temperature reduction is found to be from -1.8 to -4.4 degrees C in the subsurface over a period of 30 years. This can be translated to an annual extractable geothermal energy value in a unit surface area, and it ranges from 3.5 to 8.6 kW h m(-2) a(-1). The exact value is site specific and heavily depends on the soil thermal conductivity, groundwater velocity, and borehole arrangement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available