4.4 Article

The evolution of genome size and rDNA in diploid species of Chenopodium s.l. (Amaranthaceae)

Journal

BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 179, Issue 2, Pages 218-235

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/boj.12321

Keywords

chromosomes; flow cytometry; fluorescence in situ hybridization; nuclear DNA content; phylogenetic analysis; rRNA gene loci

Categories

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Centre [UMO-2011/01/B/NZ8/00096]
  2. Austria (Osterreichische Austauschdienst, OeAD) [WTZ (PL16/2012)]
  3. Poland (Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education) [WTZ (PL16/2012)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolution of genome size and ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus organization was analysed in 23 diploid species of Chenopodium s.l., all of which share the same base chromosome number of x = 9. Phylogenetic relationships among these species were inferred from plastid and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) DNA sequences. The molecular phylogenetic analyses assigned all analysed species of Chenopodium s.l. to six evolutionary lineages, corresponding to the recent new generic taxonomic treatment of Chenopodium s.l. The distribution of rDNA loci for four species is presented here for the first time using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 5S and 35S rDNA probes. Most of the 23 analysed diploid Chenopodium spp. possessed a single subterminally located 35S rDNA locus, except for three species which possessed two 35S rDNA loci. One or two 5S rDNA loci were typically localized subterminally on chromosomes, rarely interstitially. Analyses of rDNA locus numbers in a phylogenetic context resulted in the reconstruction of one locus each of 35S rDNA and 5S rDNA, both in subterminal positions, as the ancestral state. Genome sizes determined using flow cytometry were relatively small (2C value < 2.8 pg), ranging from 0.734 pg in C. schraderianum to 2.721 pg in C. californicum (nearly four-fold difference), and were often conserved within major phylogenetic lineages, suggesting an adaptive value. The reconstructed ancestral genome size was small for all evolutionary lineages, and changes have probably coincided with the divergence of major lineages. (C) 2015 The Linnean Society of London.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available