Measuring the success of blinding in placebo-controlled trials: should we be so quick to dismiss it?
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Measuring the success of blinding in placebo-controlled trials: should we be so quick to dismiss it?
Authors
Keywords
Blinding, Masking, Trials, Measuring, Reporting guidelines
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-03-02
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.022
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Fool’s gold? Why blinded trials are not always best
- (2020) Rohan Anand et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study
- (2020) Helene Moustgaard et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Testing for blinding in sham-controlled studies for procedural interventions: the third-party video method
- (2019) Jennifer Gill et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Does different information disclosure on placebo control affect blinding and trial outcomes? A case study of participant information leaflets of randomized placebo-controlled trials of acupuncture
- (2018) Soyeon Cheon et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Influence of blinding on treatment effect size estimate in randomized controlled trials of oral health interventions
- (2018) Humam Saltaji et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Does aerobic training alleviate fatigue and improve societal participation in patients with multiple sclerosis? A randomized controlled trial
- (2017) Martin Heine et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Does aerobic training alleviate fatigue and improve societal participation in patients with multiple sclerosis? A randomized controlled trial
- (2017) Martin Heine et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- The matching quality of experimental and control interventions in blinded pharmacological randomised clinical trials: a methodological systematic review
- (2016) Segun Bello et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Empirical evaluation of which trial characteristics are associated with treatment effect estimates
- (2016) Agnes Dechartres et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLoS One
- Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors
- (2014) Asbjørn Hróbjartsson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Bias due to lack of patient blinding in clinical trials. A systematic review of trials randomizing patients to blind and nonblind sub-studies
- (2014) Asbjørn Hróbjartsson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- In search of justification for the unpredictability paradox
- (2014) Jeremy Howick et al. Trials
- Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors
- (2013) A. Hrobjartsson et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- CONSORT 2010 changes and testing blindness in RCTs
- (2010) Kenneth F Schulz et al. LANCET
- Towards a proposal for assessment of blinding success in clinical trials: up-to-date review
- (2009) Jafar Kolahi et al. COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started