4.4 Article

Can Triticum urartu (Poaceae) be identified by pollen analysis? Implications for detecting the ancestor of the extinct two-grained einkorn-like wheat

Journal

BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 177, Issue 2, Pages 278-289

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/boj.12238

Keywords

cultivation; exine pattern; Fertile Crescent; palynology; phase-contrast microscopy; scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Categories

Funding

  1. British Academy [SG100871]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The domestication of the one-grained einkorn (Triticum monococcum) in the Near East is relatively well known. However, an independent two-grained einkorn-like domestication has been archaeobotanically detected and scarce information is available. Triticum urartu, a wild wheat, was not fully described until the 1970s because the phenology does not allow it to be distinguished easily from wild einkorn (Triticum boeoticum subsp. thaoudar), although a genetic separation exists. Both species are mostly two grained and could potentially be the relatives of the extinct two-grained form. Pollen grains of several genetically well-identified wheat species, including T.urartu and T.boeoticum subsp. thaoudar, were studied by measuring the grain diameter and examining the exine sculpturing with phase-contrast microscopy and scanning electron microscopy to gain an insight into differences enabling taxonomic identification. This work showed that, although T.urartu pollen is smaller on average, grain diameter is not sufficient because of the size overlap between the species, but T.urartu presents a different exine sculpturing (scabrate) from other Triticum spp. (aerolate). This outcome is useful for taxonomists and archaeobotanists. First, it will allow a simple re-classification of herbarium materials. Second, further research could establish whether T.urartu was cultivated.(c) 2015 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 177, 278-289.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available