4.7 Article

EOR by Low Salinity Water and Surfactant at Low Concentration: Impact of Injection and in Situ Brine Composition

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 2705-2713

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02899

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Lundin Norway AS
  2. Statoil ASA
  3. Det Norske Oljeselskap
  4. GDF SUEZ EP International
  5. Unger Fabrikker AS
  6. Research Council of Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low salinity water (LSW) and low salinity surfactant (LSS) core flooding experiments were performed to study the impact of ionic composition on oil recovery from aged Berea sandstone cores. Surfactant adsorption in packed beds, contact angles, interfacial tension (IFT), critical micellar concentration (CMC), and end-point relative permeabilities were used to better understand wettability alteration. In the samples aged with the same in situ brine with (Ca2+ + Mg2+)/Na+ = 0.033, both endpoint relative permeabilities of LSW flooding and contact angles showed LSW with only sodium chloride made the samples more water-wet than LSW with divalent-contained brines. Oil recovery was also highest in LSW injection with only sodium chloride. In tertiary LSS of the same core samples, according to both flooding and contact angles, LSS with only sodium chloride showed more water wetness. Characterization measurements showed that, at higher Ca2+/Na+ ratio, CMC and IFT were lower whereas surfactant adsorption was higher. Further, at similar conditions, LSW and LSS made the core sample more water-wet than high salinity water (HSW) and high salinity surfactant (HSS). At low surfactant concentration, LSS recovered as much oil as HSS did.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available