4.6 Article

An ACOPF-based bilevel optimization approach for vulnerability assessment of a power system

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106455

Keywords

Vulnerability assessment; Mixed-integer bilevel nonlinear program (MIBNLP); Mixed-integer linear program (MILP); Power system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the effects of reactive power dispatch, losses, and voltage profile on the vulnerability analysis of power systems, introducing an attacker-defender Stackelberg game model and proposing the AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) as a tool for defenders to mitigate attack consequences. The proposed MILP model is compared with the DCOPF-based approach in relevant literature, showing that DCOPF-based approach results in lower or equal damage in terms of load shedding, while also highlighting the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed MILP model for power system vulnerability analysis.
This paper examines the effects of reactive power dispatch, losses, and voltage profile on the results of the interdiction model to analyze the vulnerability of the power system. First, an attacker-defender Stackelberg game is introduced. The introduced game is modeled as a bilevel optimization problem where the attacker is modeled in the upper level and the defender is modeled in the lower level. The AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) is proposed as the defender's tool in the lower-level problem to mitigate the attack consequences. Our proposed ACOPF-based mathematical framework is inherently a mixed-integer bilevel nonlinear program (MIBNLP) that is NP-hard and computationally challenging. This paper linearizes and then transforms it into a one-level mixed integer linear program (MILP) using the duality theory and some proposed linearization techniques. The proposed MILP model can be solved to the global optimum using state-of-the-art solvers such as Cplex. Numerical results on two IEEE systems and Iran's 400-kV transmission network demonstrate the performance of the proposed MILP for vulnerability assessment. We have also compared our MILP model with the DCOPF-based approach proposed in the relevant literature. The comparative results show that the reported damage measured in terms of load shedding for the DCOPF-based approach is always lower than or equal to that for the ACOPF-based approach and these models report a different set of critical lines, especially in more stressed and larger power systems. Also, the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed MILP model for power-system vulnerability analysis are discussed and highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available