4.4 Article

Preparation of porous fluorinated polyimide separator for lithium-ion batteries by non-solvent induced phase separation process

Journal

HIGH PERFORMANCE POLYMERS
Volume 33, Issue 7, Pages 774-784

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954008320988156

Keywords

Fluorinated polyimide; porous separator; non-solvent induced phase separation process; lithium-ion batteries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of novel porous fluorinated polyimide (FPI) separators were prepared, showing good stability and thermal stability in electrolytes, excellent electrolyte uptake performance, and promising potential as a high-performance material in lithium-ion batteries.
A series of novel porous fluorinated polyimide (FPI) separators containing trifluoromethyl group (-CF3) were prepared by the non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) strategy. The prepared FPI separator with 60% molar content (fluorinated dianhydride: non-fluorinated dianhydride: diamine = 60: 40: 100) of fluorinated groups (FPI-60%) could stably exist in the electrolyte as a LIBs separator. The resultant FPI-60% separator possesses high thermal stability with the T-g of 289.4 degrees C and exhibits no shrinkage even at 200 degrees C. The morphologies of the FPI-60% separators were adjusted by introducing small molecular non-solvent additives-ethanol, and the FPI-60% separators present the spongy-like and interconnected structure with different porosity as the amount of ethanol changed from 1 wt% to 10 wt%. The FPI-60% separators display excellent electrolyte uptake with 170%-200% and the ionic conductive could reach 1.17 mS/cm which is four times approximately than that of the PP separator. The lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) using FPI-60% separators with 10 wt% ethanol added show better rate capacities (102.8 mAh/g, 70.8 mAh/g of PI-10 and PP separator at 2 C, respectively) and the capacity retention rate is 93.2% after 50 cycles. The results prove that the porous FPI separator is a promising candidate for high-performance LIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available