To what extent can Ulva and Sargassum be detected and separated in satellite imagery?

Blooms of floating macroalgae have been reported around the world, among which are recurrent blooms of Ulva prolifera and Sargassum horneri in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. While satellite remote sensing has often been used to estimate their distributions and abundance as well as to trace their origins, because the algae mats are often much smaller than the size of an image pixel, it is unclear to what extent they can be detected and discriminated from each other in satellite imagery. Using data collected from laboratory experiments and by the Sentinel-3 OLCI (Ocean and Land Colour Instrument) and Sentinel-2 MSI (Multi Spectral Instrument) satellite instruments, we conduct simulated experiments to determine the lower detection limit and discrimination limit for these two macroalgae in different water environments and under different atmospheric conditions. For OLCI, the detection limit for both macroalgae is about 0.5% of a pixel, while the discrimination limit varies between 0.8% for clear water and 2% for turbid water. For MSI, the detection limit is about 2%, while the discrimination limit is about 6% for all water types. Below these two limits, detection and discrimination of macroalgae in these regions using the two sensors are subject to large uncertainties, thus requiring additional caution when interpreting algae areas and tracing algae origins.

Automated summary

By conducting simulated experiments using satellite data and laboratory data, the study determined the lower detection and discrimination limits for two types of macroalgae in different water environments. The detection and discrimination limits varied for OLCI and MSI satellite instruments, suggesting uncertainties in detecting and distinguishing macroalgae in certain water conditions.