4.6 Review

Standardization of lower extremity quantitative lymphedema measurements and associated patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic cancers

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 2, Pages 625-632

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.026

Keywords

Lymphedema; Quantitative measurements; Patient reported outcomes; Gynecologic cancers; Oncologic surgical treatment

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By practicing changing the standardization of quantitative measurements of lower extremity lymphedema with integrated patient reported outcomes, optimal risk-reduction strategies to diminish limb-related dysfunction and morbidity associated with treatment of gynecologic cancers are likely to be refined and redefined. A diverse group of experts in cancer treatment, therapy, and patient reported outcomes gathered by the National Cancer Institute discussed the current state-of-the-science in lymphedema evaluation, aiming to incorporate new strategies for optimal evaluation of lymphedema in future gynecologic clinical trials.
Practice changing standardization of lower extremity lymphedema quantitative measurements with integrated patient reported outcomes will likely refine and redefine the optimal risk-reduction strategies to diminish the devastating limb-related dysfunction and morbidity associated with treatment of gynecologic cancers. The National Cancer Institute (NCI), Division of Cancer Prevention brought together a diverse group of cancer treatment, therapy and patient reported outcomes experts to discuss the current state-of-the-science in lymphedema evaluation with the potential goal of incorporating new strategies for optimal evaluation of lymphedema in future developing gynecologic clinical trials. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available