4.7 Article

An Atmospheric Signal Lowering the Spring Predictability Barrier in Statistical ENSO Forecasts

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GL091287

Keywords

Data‐ driven models; ENSO; SST footprint; statistical forecasts

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-42-04121]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-02-00502]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [19-42-04121] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies suggest that Pacific atmospheric circulation anomalies in winter-spring may impact summer tropical climate via SST footprinting. Researchers have inferred an index based on sea level pressure data surrounding Hawaii and constructed a statistically optimal linear model of the Nino 3.4 index with this atmospheric index as a forcing, leading to significant improvements in interseasonal Nino 3.4 forecasts by efficiently lowering the spring predictability barrier.
The loss of autocorrelations of tropical sea surface temperatures (SST) during late spring, also called the spring predictability barrier (SPB), is a factor that strongly limits the predictability of El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and especially the statistical SST-based ENSO forecasts starting from the winter-spring season. Recent studies show that Pacific atmospheric circulation anomalies in winter-spring may have a long-term impact on the summer tropical climate via the SST footprint. Here, we infer an index based on sea level pressure (SLP) data from February to March in a single area surrounding Hawaii, and show that this area is the most informative part of the large SLP pattern initiating the SST footprinting mechanism. We then construct a statistically optimal linear model of the Nino 3.4 index taking this atmospheric index as a forcing. We find that this forcing efficiently lowers the SPB and provides significant improvements of interseasonal Nino 3.4 forecasts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available