4.6 Review

Pediatric high-grade glioma: moving toward subtype-specific multimodal therapy

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 288, Issue 21, Pages 6127-6141

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/febs.15739

Keywords

convection‐ enhanced delivery; immunotherapy; pediatric high‐ grade glioma; radiation‐ induced glioma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGG) are a lethal and heterogenous category requiring more effective treatment options. The review discusses the history of treatment approaches to pHGG, different molecular subgroups of pHGG, targeted treatment options, and novel approaches such as localized convection-enhanced chemotherapy delivery and immunotherapy. It demonstrates the potential for molecularly driven therapy combined with other novel methods to improve prognosis in pHGG.
Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGG) comprise a deadly, heterogenous category of pediatric gliomas with a clear need for more effective treatment options. Advances in high-throughput molecular techniques have enhanced molecular understanding of these tumors, but outcomes are still poor, and treatments beyond resection and radiation have not yet been clearly established as standard of care. In this review, we first discuss the history of treatment approaches to pHGG to this point. We then review four distinct categories of pHGG, including histone 3-mutant, IDH-mutant, histone 3/IDH-wildtype, and radiation-induced pHGG. We discuss the molecular understanding of each subgroup and targeted treatment options in development. Finally, we look at the development and current status of two novel approaches to pHGG as a whole: localized convection-enhanced chemotherapy delivery and immunotherapy, including checkpoint inhibitors, vaccine therapy, and CAR-T cells. Through this review, we demonstrate the potential for rational, molecularly driven, subtype-specific therapy to be used with other novel approaches in combinations that could meaningfully improve the prognosis in pHGG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available