4.4 Article

Are paedomorphs actual larvae?

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS
Volume 250, Issue 6, Pages 779-787

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.304

Keywords

metamorphosis; paedomorphosis; post embryonic transition; thyroid hormone signaling; urodeles

Funding

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle [ATM AMADE]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amphibians exhibit diverse life cycles, with direct development, biphasic development, and a more complex strategy found in Urodeles. Recent research suggests that paedomorphs undergo a proper developmental transition similar to post embryonic transition, indicating a marker of biphasic development. This implies a decoupling of post embryonic transition and metamorphosis in complex life cycles.
Amphibians display very diverse life cycles and development can be direct, where it occurs in ovo and a juvenile hatches directly, or biphasic, where an aquatic larva hatches and later undergoes metamorphosis followed by sexual maturation. In both cases, metamorphosis, corresponds to the post embryonic transition (PETr). A third strategy, only found in Urodeles, is more complex as larvae reach sexual maturity before metamorphosis, which can become accessory. The resulting paedomorphs retain their larval characters and keep their aquatic habitat. Does it mean that paedomorphs do not undergo PETr? Recent work using high throughput technologies coupled to system biology and developmental endocrinology revisited this question and provided novel datasets indicating that a paedomorph's larval tissue undergoes a proper developmental transition. Together with historical data, we propose that this transition is a marker of the PETr, which would be distinct from metamorphosis. This implies that (a) complex life cycles would result from the uncoupling of PETr and metamorphosis, and (b) biphasic life cycles would be a special cases where they occur simultaneously.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available