4.4 Article

Correlation of band electronic structure with efficiency in perovskite solar cells with vanadium (IV) oxide thin film buffers

Journal

CURRENT APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 62-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2021.01.005

Keywords

Perovskite solar cells; Vanadium oxide; XPS; Band alignment; Band offset; PCE

Funding

  1. national research foundation of Korea [NRF-2019R1A2C2003804]
  2. Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea
  3. Ajou University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perovskite solar cells with a vanadium oxide buffer layer were studied to understand the mechanism of electron and hole transport under light irradiation. The power conversion efficiency was found to vary depending on the process type, due to inconsistent valence band offset affecting hole transport. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth measurements were used to analyze the band alignment and structure of the cell stacks.
Perovskite solar cells have been studied extensively in the area of perovskite solar cells because they have a comparatively free hysteresis. Through fabrication of a perovskite solar cell based on a vanadium oxide buffer, this study clarified the mechanism of electron and hole transport in the laminated layer upon irradiation with light. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the Vanadium (IV) oxide (VO2) sputtering process device was approximately 13% and with the spin-coating process was 8.5%. To investigate the physicochemical origin of such PCE differences depending on the process type, comprehensive band alignment and band structure analyses of the actual cell stacks were performed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth measurements. Accordingly, it was found that the inconsistent valence band offset between the perovskite absorption layer and V2O5 layer as a function of the VO2 process type caused a difference in the hole transport, resulting in the difference in the efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available