4.7 Article

3D deep learning based classification of pulmonary ground glass opacity nodules with automatic segmentation

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101814

Keywords

Pulmonary ground glass opacity nodules; Classification; Automatic segmentation; Joint training; Deep learning

Funding

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health [P41EB015898, R01EB025964]
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a joint deep learning model that utilizes segmentation to assist in the better classification of lung GGNs. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms other baseline models on all diagnostic classification tasks.
Classifying ground-glass lung nodules (GGNs) into atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) on diagnostic CT images is important to evaluate the therapy options for lung cancer patients. In this paper, we propose a joint deep learning model where the segmentation can better facilitate the classification of pulmonary GGNs. Based on our observation that masking the nodule to train the model results in better lesion classification, we propose to build a cascade architecture with both segmentation and classification networks. The segmentation model works as a trainable preprocessing module to provide the classification-guided 'attention' weight map to the raw CT data to achieve better diagnosis performance. We evaluate our proposed model and compare with other baseline models for 4 clinically significant nodule classification tasks, defined by a combination of pathology types, using 4 classification metrics: Accuracy, Average F1 Score, Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms other baseline models on all the diagnostic classification tasks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available