Comparing the Ability of Physician-Reported Versus Patient-Reported Performance Status to Predict Survival in a Population-Based Cohort of Newly Diagnosed Cancer Patients
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparing the Ability of Physician-Reported Versus Patient-Reported Performance Status to Predict Survival in a Population-Based Cohort of Newly Diagnosed Cancer Patients
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-02-05
DOI
10.1016/j.clon.2021.01.008
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Prognostication in advanced cancer: update and directions for future research
- (2019) David Hui et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Patient-Reported Functional Status in Outpatients With Advanced Cancer: Correlation With Physician-Reported Scores and Survival
- (2018) Gordana Popovic et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
- Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a decision-tree-based model
- (2017) Etienne Audureau et al. JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
- Relationship between physician and patient assessment of performance status and survival in a large cohort of patients with haematologic malignancies
- (2016) Michael A Liu et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- A Validated Prediction Model for Overall Survival From Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Toward Survival Prediction for Individual Patients
- (2015) Cary Oberije et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
- Patient-reported outcomes are associated with patient-oncologist agreement of performance status in a multi-ethnic Asian population
- (2014) Chun Fan Lee et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Population-Based Standardized Symptom Screening: Cancer Care Ontario's Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and Performance Status Initiatives
- (2014) José Pereira et al. Journal of Oncology Practice
- Simple Prognostic Model for Patients With Advanced Cancer Based on Performance Status
- (2014) Raymond W. Jang et al. Journal of Oncology Practice
- Objective Measures of Physical Functional Capacity Warrant Exploration to Complement or Replace the Subjective Physician Estimated Performance Status
- (2012) Guru Sonpavde et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
- Performance status of patients is the major prognostic factor at all stages of pancreatic cancer
- (2012) Faruk Tas et al. International Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Cancer Care Ontario's experience with implementation of routine physical and psychological symptom distress screening
- (2011) Deborah Dudgeon et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Longitudinal Patient-Reported Performance Status Assessment in the Cancer Clinic Is Feasible and Prognostic
- (2011) Sang-Yeon Suh et al. Journal of Oncology Practice
- Prognostic Factors in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Use of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment in Survival Prediction
- (2010) Lisa Martin et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Nurse and physician inter-rater agreement of three performance status measures in palliative care outpatients
- (2009) Camilla Zimmermann et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Patient-physician disagreement regarding performance status is associated with worse survivorship in patients with advanced cancer
- (2008) Ian D. Schnadig et al. CANCER
- Predicting survival in patients with advanced disease
- (2008) Paul Glare et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer
- (2008) Edward Chow et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Should Patient-Rated Performance Status Affect Treatment Decisions in Advanced Lung Cancer?
- (2008) Esther Dajczman et al. Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started