4.7 Article

Metallic B2C monolayer as a promising anode material for Li/Na ion storage

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 406, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126812

Keywords

Two-dimensional B2C; Metallic properties; Lithium/sodium ion battery anode; First-principles calculations

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51801086]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The metallic B2C shows high theoretical capacity of 1596 mAlrg-1 for both LIBs and NIBs and maintains good thermal stability and electronic conductivity, making it a potential high-performance anode material.
Two-dimensional (2D) materials have garnered extensive enthusiasm and become the promising candidates as electrode materials for rechargeable ion batteries owning to their high surface area and excellent electrical, thermal and mechanical properties. Recently, a new stable 2D material named B2C was theoretically proposed and possesses metallic properties. Due to its light weight and intrinsic advantage of transportation of electrons, we further assess the feasibility of B2C monolayer to serve as Li and Na ion batteries (LIBs/NIBs) anode material by using first-principles calculations. The results reveal that B2C exhibits a very high theoretical capacity of 1596 mAlrg -1 for both LIBs and NIBs. Impressively, the structure of B2C can be well maintained at the maximum concentration (Li2B2C/Na2B2C) at 400 K, suggesting its good thermal stability. Moreover, B2C offers moderate average open circuit voltages (Li: 0.57 V, Na: 0.43 V) and fast motilities with lower diffusion barriers (Li: 0.49 eV, Na: 0.23 eV). Finally, B2C can maintain metallic properties during the whole Li/Na ion insertion processes, meaning that the material has a favorable electronic conductivity. Our findings demonstrate that metallic B2C could be a potential LIBs/NIBs anode material with high performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available