4.7 Article

Stochastic resonance in a metal-oxide memristive device

Journal

CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110723

Keywords

Memristor; Resistive switching; Yttria-stabilized zirconium dioxide; Tantalum oxide; Time series statistical analysis; stochastic; model; Stochastic resonance

Funding

  1. Government of the Russian Federation [074-02-2018-330 (2)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through experimental and theoretical studies, it has been found that adding white noise can enhance resistive switching and memristance response in a specific metal-oxide memristive device, triggering the stochastic resonance phenomenon. This suggests that noise and fluctuations can play a constructive role in nonlinear memristive systems far from equilibrium.
The stochastic resonance phenomenon has been studied experimentally and theoretically for a state-of art metal-oxide memristive device based on yttria-stabilized zirconium dioxide and tantalum pentoxide, which exhibits bipolar filamentary resistive switching of anionic type. The effect of white Gaussian noise superimposed on the sub-threshold sinusoidal driving signal is analyzed through the time series statistics of the resistive switching parameters, the spectral response to a periodic perturbation and the signal-tonoise ratio at the output of the nonlinear system. The stabilized resistive switching and the increased memristance response are revealed in the observed regularities at an optimal noise intensity corresponding to the stochastic resonance phenomenon and interpreted using a stochastic memristor model taking into account an external noise source added to the control voltage. The obtained results clearly show that noise and fluctuations can play a constructive role in nonlinear memristive systems far from equilibrium. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available