4.5 Article

Preparation and characterization of chitosan/Nano-ZnO composite film with antimicrobial activity

Journal

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1193-1199

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-021-02521-x

Keywords

Nano-ZnO; Chitosan; Composite films; Antibacterial activity

Funding

  1. National Key Research & Development (R&D) Program of China [2016YFD0200502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772193]
  3. Open Research Fund from State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests [SKLOF202006]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT19TD38]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chitosan composite films incorporating zinc oxide particles of different sizes showed improved antimicrobial activity, with the 50 nm zinc oxide particles demonstrating the best bacteriostatic effect. This study suggests the potential of nano-ZnO particles as effective antibacterial additives in food packaging.
Chitosan is promising material for making food packaging film with antimicrobial activity. However, chitosan film usually has limited mechanical and antimicrobial properties and higher water solubility. To improve the performance of chitosan film, in this work, chitosan composite films were prepared by incorporating different sizes of zinc oxide particles of 5 mu m, 100 nm, and 50 nm. The films were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and mechanical analysis. Antimicrobial assay of the chitosan and CTS/nano-ZnO composite films against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus show that the composite chitosan films have better antibacterial activity. The film containing 0.3% of 50 nm zinc oxide particles showed the best inhibition rate, suggesting that smaller sizes of nano-ZnO particles have better bacteriostatic activity and potent application as an antibacterial additive ingredient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available