4.5 Article

Quantitative Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Single Cells with Time-resolved ICP-MS

Journal

ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 114-119

Publisher

ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.46770/AS.2021.102

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21974116]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2016YFA0201600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-efficiency sample introduction system was used for single cell analysis with ICP-MS, greatly improving the transport efficiency of single cells. The study also successfully utilized time-resolved ICP-MS for analysis of gold nanoparticles in individual cells, with validation through calibration using AuNP standard reference materials.
Single-cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS) has been introduced for the analysis of intracellular essential elements and nanoparticles (NPs) at the single cell level. However, it is still quite challenging for accurate and reliable determination. In this work, a high-efficiency sample introduction system was used for single cell analysis with ICP-MS. The system includes a microconcentric nebulizer, a low-volume single pass spray chamber, and a syringe pump. The transport efficiency of single cells was greatly improved to similar to 12%. In addition, Au-197 signals in individual HepG2 cells, after incubation with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) at the concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mu M for 12 h, were analyzed by time-resolved ICP-MS with dwell times of 100 mu s and 5 ms, respectively. The 197Au signal-to-background ratio (S/B) at 100 mu s dwell time was much higher than at 5 ms. For quantitative analysis, AuNP standard reference materials were used for calibration. The SC-ICP-MS data using NP calibration were in good agreement with those using solution ICP-MS analysis, validating the developed SC-ICP-MS method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available