4.6 Review

Coronary provocative tests in the catheterization laboratory: Pathophysiological bases, methodological considerations and clinical implications

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 318, Issue -, Pages 14-21

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.12.008

Keywords

Provocative test; Myocardial ischemia; Coronary microvascular dysfunction; Vasospastic angina; Precision medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The management of angina and myocardial ischemia has historically focused on obstructive coronary artery disease, but a significant proportion of patients do not have obstructive CAD. Functional mechanisms and coronary vasomotor disorders may be involved in myocardial ischemia, but diagnosing these disorders can be challenging. Coronary provocative tests can provide valuable information on the pathogenic mechanism of myocardial ischemia, but their use in clinical practice is limited and mainly restricted to specialized centers.
The paradigm for the management of patients presenting with angina and/or myocardial ischemia has been historically centered on the detection and treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, in a considerable proportion (30-50%) of patients undergoing coronary angiography, obstructive CAD is excluded. Thus, functional mechanisms may be involved in determining myocardial ischemia and should be investigated. In particular, coronary vasomotor disorders both at epicardial and at microvascular level may play a crucial role, but a definitive diagnosis of these disorders can at times be difficult, given the transience of symptoms, and often requires the use of coronary provocative tests. Of importance, these tests may provide relevant information on the pathogenic mechanism of myocardial ischemia, allowing physicians to tailor the therapies of their patients. Furthermore, several studies underscored the important prognostic information deriving from the use of coronary provocative tests. Nevertheless, their use in clinical practice is currently limited and mainly restricted to specialized centers, with only a minority of patients receiving a benefit from this diagnostic approach. In this review, we explain the pathophysiological bases for the use of provocative tests, along with their clinical, prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available