4.2 Article

An inverse stage-shift model to estimate the excess mortality and health economic impact of delayed access to cancer services due to the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 359-367

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13505

Keywords

COVID-19; diagnostic delays; economic outcomes; health outcomes; modeling; oncology; stage shift; time to treatment initiation; treatment delays

Categories

Funding

  1. Melanoma Research Victoria
  2. Victorian Government through the Victorian Cancer Agency Translational Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that the COVID-19 pandemic has delayed cancer diagnosis and treatment, impacting survival outcomes and healthcare costs. Based on Australian data, even a conservative once-off 3-month delay is predicted to result in 88 excess deaths and $12 million excess healthcare costs.
Aim Decreased cancer incidence and reported changes to clinical management indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has delayed cancer diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to develop and apply a flexible model to estimate the impact of delayed diagnosis and treatment on survival outcomes and healthcare costs based on a shift in the disease stage at treatment initiation. Methods A model was developed and made publicly available to estimate population-level health economic outcomes by extrapolating and weighing stage-specific outcomes by the distribution of stages at treatment initiation. It was applied to estimate the impact of 3- and 6-month delays based on Australian data for stage I breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer patients, and for T1 melanoma. Two approaches were explored to estimate stage shifts following a delay: (a) based on the relation between time to treatment initiation and overall survival (breast, colorectal, and lung cancer), and (b) based on the tumor growth rate (melanoma). Results Using a conservative once-off 3-month delay and considering only shifts from stage I/T1 to stage II/T2, 88 excess deaths and $12 million excess healthcare costs were predicted in Australia over 5 years for all patients diagnosed in 2020. For a 6-month delay, excess mortality and healthcare costs were 349 deaths and $46 million over 5 years. Conclusions The health and economic impacts of delays in treatment initiation cause an imminent policy concern. More accurate individual patient data on shifts in stage of disease during and after the COVID-19 pandemic are critical for further analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Oncology

Real-world adjuvant chemotherapy treatment patterns and outcomes over time for resected stage II and III colorectal cancer

Yat Hang To, Koen Degeling, Melanie McCoy, Rachel Wong, Ian Jones, Catherine Dunn, Wei Hong, Matthew Loft, Peter Gibbs, Jeanne Tie

Summary: This study aims to evaluate temporal trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and its impact on outcomes. The study found that the use of AC has moderately decreased over time, but it does not affect recurrence rates. Improved survival in more recent years may be related to improved baseline staging, better postrecurrence treatment, and reduced noncancer-related mortality.

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2023)

Article Oncology

A Phase Ib/II Trial of Combined BRAF and EGFR Inhibition in BRAF V600E Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Other Cancers: The EVICT (Erlotinib and Vemurafenib In Combination Trial) Study

Lavinia Tan, Ben Tran, Jeanne Tie, Ben Markman, Sumi Ananda, Niall C. Tebbutt, Michael Michael, Emma Link, Stephen Q. Wong, Sushma Chandrashekar, Jerick Guinto, David Ritchie, Rachel Koldej, Benjamin J. Solomon, Grant A. McArthur, Rodney J. Hicks, Peter Gibbs, Sarah-Jane Dawson, Jayesh Desai

Summary: BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer is a significant clinical problem. Combination therapy with vemurafenib and small-molecule EGFR inhibitors has shown effectiveness in pre-clinical studies, but clinical investigation is lacking.

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH (2023)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Contingency management and pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence support services (CoMPASS): A hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study to promote HIV risk reduction among people who inject drugs

Minhee L. Sung, Adam Viera, Denise Esserman, Guangyu Tong, Daniel Davidson, Sherry Aiudi, Genie L. Bailey, Ashley L. Buchanan, Marianne Buchelli, Mark Jenkins, Betsey John, Jennifer Kolakowski, Albana Lame, Sean M. Murphy, Elizabeth Porter, Laura Simone, Manuel Paris, Carla J. Rash, E. Jennifer Edelman

Summary: This study introduces a new research called CoMPASS, which aims to promote HIV risk reduction among persons who inject drugs (PWID). It is a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial that utilizes rewards and ongoing support to encourage PWID to use HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Trained PrEP navigators deliver interventions, including PrEP and other relevant treatments. The primary outcome is sustained PrEP adherence at 24 weeks. The results of this study will provide insights into the feasibility and impact of implementing CoMPASS in community-based organizations.

CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2023)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Prognostic role of detailed colorectal location and tumor molecular features: analyses of 13,101 colorectal cancer patients including 2994 early-onset cases

Tomotaka Ugai, Naohiko Akimoto, Koichiro Haruki, Tabitha A. Harrison, Yin Cao, Conghui Qu, Andrew T. Chan, Peter T. Campbell, Sonja Berndt, Daniel D. Buchanan, Amanda J. Cross, Brenda Diergaarde, Steven J. Gallinger, Marc J. Gunter, Sophia Harlid, Akihisa Hidaka, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Jenny Chang-Claude, Li Hsu, Mark A. Jenkins, Yi Lin, Roger L. Milne, Victor Moreno, Polly A. Newcomb, Reiko Nishihara, Mireia Obon-Santacana, Rish K. Pai, Lori C. Sakoda, Robert E. Schoen, Martha L. Slattery, Wei Sun, Efrat L. Amitay, Elizabeth Alwers, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Amanda E. Toland, Bethany Van Guelpen, Syed H. Zaidi, John D. Potter, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, Marios Giannakis, Mingyang Song, Jonathan A. Nowak, Ulrike Peters, Amanda Phipps, Shuji Ogino

Summary: This study analyzed 13,101 colorectal cancer cases and found a significant association between tumor location and molecular features. The detailed colonic location and tumor molecular features play an important role in the prognostication and precision medicine of colon cancer.

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Establishing a Longitudinal Opioid Pharmacogenomic Registry for Cancer Patients: Feasibility and Acceptability

Jennifer Philip, Aaron Wong, Leeanne Pasanen, Andrew A. Somogyi, Justin Rubio, Pal Klepstad, Anna Collins, Peter Gibbs, Brian Le

Summary: This study examined the feasibility of establishing an opioid pharmacogenomics registry for cancer patients. The results showed that establishing such a registry is feasible and acceptable by both patients and clinicians.

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Real-world clinical outcomes and cost estimates of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment: does sequencing of taxanes and androgen receptor-targeted agents matter?

Amanda Pereira-Salgado, Angelyn Anton, Fanny Franchini, Robert K. Mahar, Edmond M. Kwan, Shirley Wong, Julia Shapiro, Andrew Weickhardt, Arun A. Azad, Lavinia Spain, Ashray Gunjur, Javier Torres, Phillip Parente, Francis Parnis, Jeffrey Goh, Christopher Steer, Stephen Brown, Peter Gibbs, Ben Tran, Maarten IJzerman

Summary: The health economic outcomes of real-world treatment sequencing of androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTA) and docetaxel (DOC) are unclear.

EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2023)

Review Health Policy & Services

Health economic evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer: a systematic review

Yat Hang To, Peter Gibbs, Jeanne Tie, Maarten IJzerman, Koen Degeling

Summary: This study evaluated the health economic evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer and identified gaps in the available evidence. A total of 38 studies were identified and stratified by cancer stage and chemotherapy strategy. The results consistently supported the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in both stage II and III colon cancer. Biomarker-driven approaches to patient selection have potential to be cost-effective, but more robust evidence is needed.

COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION (2023)

Article Oncology

Early Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics and Efficacy of Lorlatinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive, Advanced, ALK-Positive NSCLC

Ross A. Soo, Jean-Francois Martini, Anthonie J. van der Wekken, Shunsuke Teraoka, Roberto Ferrara, Alice T. Shaw, Deborah Shepard, Anna Maria Calella, Anna Polli, Francesca Toffalorio, Pascale Tomasini, Chao-Hua Chiu, Dariusz M. Kowalski, Hye Ryun Kim, Benjamin J. Solomon

Summary: In treatment-naive patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, ctDNA can be used as a biomarker to predict the efficacy of lorlatinib treatment.

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated non-small- cell lung cancer with KRASG12C mutation: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Adrianus Johannes de Langen, Melissa L. Johnson, Julien Mazieres, Anne -Marie C. Dingemans, Giannis Mountzios, Miklos Pless, Jurgen Wolf, Martin Schuler, Herve Lena, Ferdinandos Skoulidis, Yasuto Yoneshima, Sang-We Kim, Helena Linardou, Silvia Novello, Anthonie J. van der Wekken, Yuanbin Chen, Solange Peters, Enriqueta Felip, Benjamin J. Solomon, Suresh S. Ramalingam, Christophe Dooms, Colin R. Lindsay, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Normand Blais, Cynthia C. Obiozor, Yang Wang, Bhakti Mehta, Tracy Varrieur, Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith, Bjorn Stollenwerk, David Waterhouse, Luis Paz-Ares

Summary: This study compared the efficacy and safety of Sotorasib with standard-of-care treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the KRASG12C mutation. The results showed that compared to docetaxel, Sotorasib significantly increased progression-free survival and had a more favorable safety profile.

LANCET (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Systematic review of NTRK 1/2/3 fusion prevalence pan-cancer and across solid tumours

Sophie O'Haire, Fanny Franchini, Yoon-Jung Kang, Julia Steinberg, Karen Canfell, Jayesh Desai, Stephen Fox, Maarten IJzerman

Summary: NTRK gene fusions are rare somatic mutations found in various cancer types, and targeted therapies for them are emerging. However, integrating these treatments into healthcare systems poses challenges due to uncertain prevalence and optimal testing methods. To address this, a systematic review was conducted to determine the prevalence of NTRK fusions and guide efficient diagnostic screening. The review included 160 studies and found that NTRK fusion-positive cancers are rare and widely distributed across solid tumors. However, small-scale and heterogeneous data make it difficult to predict prevalence accurately. Further large-scale, standardized genomic data are needed to better understand NTRK fusion epidemiology.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2023)

Review Oncology

Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK plus non-small cell lung cancer-a narrative review

Grace Chazan, Benjamin J. Solomon

Summary: First-line treatment options for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors harbour anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have evolved rapidly. Although newer generation ALK inhibitors have demonstrated superiority to crizotinib, head-to-head clinical trials comparing these inhibitors are lacking. Decisions on optimal first-line treatment must be based on analysis of relevant trials and consideration of various factors.

TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH (2023)

Letter Medicine, General & Internal

Re: Molecular testing to deliver personalised chemotherapy recommendations

Peter Gibbs, Wei Hong, Jeanne Tie

Summary: The use of biomarkers in cancer medicine is gaining increasing attention, but evaluating their effectiveness remains challenging. Ongoing discussions are being held regarding the optimal trial methodologies and evidence requirements for biomarker validation. This debate is crucial in optimizing clinical trial design and improving patient care.

BMC MEDICINE (2023)

Article Oncology

The Association of Oxaliplatin-Containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy Duration with Overall and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Individuals with Stage III Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Colin Sue-Chue-Lam, Christine Brezden-Masley, Rinku Sutradhar, Amy Y. X. Yu, Nancy N. Baxter

Summary: This study examined the association between the duration of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy and mortality in stage III colon cancer. The results showed that compared to receiving a full course of treatment, patients who received only 50% of the course had slightly higher overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality, but the differences were not significant.

CURRENT ONCOLOGY (2023)

Article Primary Health Care

Exploring the barriers to and facilitators of implementing CanRisk in primary care: a qualitative thematic framework analysis

Stephanie Archer, Francisca Stutzin Donoso, Tim Carver, Adelaide Yue, Alex P. Cunningham, Lorenzo Ficorella, Marc Tischkowitz, Douglas F. Easton, Antonis C. Antoniou, Jon Emery, Juliet Usher-Smith, Fiona M. Walter

Summary: This study explored the barriers and facilitators of implementing the CanRisk tool in primary care. The main barriers identified included the time required to complete the tool, competing priorities, IT infrastructure, and PCPs' lack of confidence and knowledge. The main facilitators included the easy navigation of the tool, its potential clinical impact, and the increasing availability and expectation to use risk prediction tools.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE (2023)

Article Primary Health Care

The Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) trial: a randomised controlled trial of a decision support tool for risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening

Jon D. Emery, Mark A. Jenkins, Sibel Saya, Patty Chondros, Jasmeen Oberoi, Shakira Milton, Kitty Novy, Emily Habgood, Napin Karnchanachari, Marie Pirotta, Lyndal Trevena, Adrian Bickerstaffe, Richard De Abreu Lourenco, Anna Crothers, Driss Ait Ouakrim, Louisa Flander, James G. Dowty, Fiona M. Walter, Malcolm Clark, Sally Doncovio, Dariush Etemadmoghadam, George Fishman, Finlay Macrae, Ingrid Winship, Jennifer G. McIntosh

Summary: Using a risk assessment and decision support tool can increase the rate of risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening. It is important to start screening for colorectal cancer at the appropriate age and choose the most cost-effective testing method.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE (2023)

No Data Available