4.6 Article

Catalytic hydrogenation of furfural to tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol using competitive nickel catalysts supported on mesoporous clays

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 611, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117903

Keywords

Mesoporous clays; Nickel catalysts; THFA; Hydrogenation of furfural; Acidity; MgO

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain [CTQ2015-70982-C3-3-R]
  2. Feder Funds [CTQ2015-70982-C3-3-R]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [2017 SGR 798]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nickel catalysts supported on mesoporous clays were modified with magnesium oxide to enhance activity and selectivity in the hydrogenation of furfural to tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol. The addition of MgO neutralized acidity, leading to higher selectivity to the desired product. The best catalyst achieved total conversion and selectivity to THFA, with maintained activity after multiple reuses.
Nickel catalysts supported on mesoporous clays with different acid properties, such as montmorillonite MK-10, Al-pillared montmorillonite, mesoporous Na-saponite and mesoporous H-saponite, were prepared, characterized and tested for the hydrogenation of furfural to tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA). Clays were also modified introducing basicity through magnesium oxide in different amounts. Catalysts with higher acidity or low amounts of metallic centres favoured deactivation and/or selectivity to the non-desired products. Interestingly, the addition of MgO both neutralized the acidity of the montmorillonite supports and improved the hydrogenation of the furanic ring, resulting in higher selectivity to THFA. The best catalyst was the one prepared with montmorillonite MK-10 covered by 30 wt% of magnesium oxide and with 8.8 % of the Ni metal phase achieving total conversion and total selectivity to THFA. The activity of this catalyst was maintained after several reuses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available