4.6 Review

Cardiovascular Effects of Medical Marijuana: A Systematic Review

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages 182-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.09.015

Keywords

Cannabinoids; Cardiovascular effects; Hemodynamics; Marijuana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The utilization of marijuana for medicinal purposes is increasing in popularity, with 25 states legalizing it. However, evidence suggests that marijuana use can lead to cardiovascular side effects, and there are currently no national standards for assessing medical marijuana products. Further research is needed to determine its cardiovascular risks and proper management.
Utilization of marijuana as a medicinal agent is becoming increasingly popular, and so far, 25 states have legalized it for medical purposes. However, there is emerging evidence that marijuana use can result in cardiovascular side effects, such as rhythm abnormalities, syncope/dizziness, and myocardial infarction, among others. Further, there are currently no stringent national standards or approval processes, like Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluation, in place to assess medical marijuana products. This review includes the largest up-to-date pooled population of patients with exposure to marijuana and reported cardiovascular effects. Although purported as benign by many seeking to advance the use of marijuana as an adjunctive medical therapy across the country, marijuana is associated with its own set of cardiovascular risks and deserves further definitive study and the same level of scrutiny we apply in research of all other types of medications. When used as a medicinal agent, marijuana should be regarded accordingly, and both clinical providers and patients must be aware of potential adverse effects associated with its use for early recognition and management. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available