4.8 Article

Geometric Lessons and Design Strategies for Nanoscale Protein Cages

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 4277-4286

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c07167

Keywords

protein design; nanotechnology; symmetry; self-assembly; coiled-coil

Funding

  1. NSF [CHE-1629214]
  2. APS [GM124165, RR029205, DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein molecules add rich functionality to nanoscale architectures, particularly in high-symmetry protein cages. This study introduces a method for designing protein assemblies, successfully creating cubically symmetric cages through a combination of two simpler symmetries. Experimental testing revealed the formation of the intended octahedral cage, while another design resulted in a collapsed structure of lower stoichiometry and symmetry, providing insights for improved creation of nanoscale protein architectures.
Protein molecules bring a rich functionality to the field of designed nanoscale architectures. High-symmetry protein cages are rapidly finding diverse applications in biomedicine, nanotechnology, and imaging, but methods for their reliable and predictable construction remain challenging. In this study we introduce an approach for designing protein assemblies that combines ideas and favorable elements adapted from recent work. Cubically symmetric cages can be created by combining two simpler symmetries, following recently established principles. Here, two different oligomeric protein components are brought together in a geometrically specific arrangement by their separate genetic fusion to individual components of a heterodimeric coiled-coil polypeptide motif of known structure. Fusions between components are made by continuous a-helices to limit flexibility. After a computational design, we tested 10 different protein cage constructions experimentally, two of which formed larger assemblies. One produced the intended octahedral cage, similar to 26 nm in diameter, while the other appeared to produce the intended tetrahedral cage as a minor component, crystallizing instead in an alternate form representing a collapsed structure of lower stoichiometry and symmetry. Geometric distinctions between the two characterized designs help explain the different degrees of success, leading to clearer principles and improved prospects for the routine creation of nanoscale protein architectures using diverse methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available