4.7 Article

Numerical analysis for the prediction of bump prone conditions: A southern Appalachian pillar coal bump case study

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.12.020

Keywords

Bump; Burst; Coal; Energy release rate; LaModel; Numerical modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two miners were fatally injured in a coal mine in southern West Virginia due to a pillar bump during retreat mining. The exact failure mechanism of coal bumps is not clearly understood, despite efforts to better understand bump conditions and mitigation techniques.
Two miners were fatally injured when a pillar bump occurred during retreat mining in a southern West Virginia coal mine. The mine was operating in the Eagle seam with overmining in the No. 2 Gas and Powellton seams. A coal bump is defined as a sudden and violent failure of coal caused by the release of stored strain energy in the pillar. While significant strides have been made by academia, industry, and regulatory agencies to better understand bump conditions and mitigation techniques, coal bumps represent a long standing, highly site-specific engineering problem in which the exact failure mechanism is not clearly understood. In this case history, a cut-by-cut analysis of retreat mining operations was conducted on the 4 East Main leading up to the pillar bump event. Numerical input parameters were derived from site-specific geologic information and mine geometry for the analysis of pillar stress conditions and energy release using LaModel. An overview of stress conditions in the panel was presented including a precursor event that occurred two crosscuts inby the bump site. The methodology presented in the paper for the evaluation of the fatal bump event can be used for the identification of bump prone conditions prior to development and retreat of a mining area. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available