Increased Institutional Surgical Experience in Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Reduces Recurrence Rate: Results from a Nationwide Study
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Increased Institutional Surgical Experience in Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Reduces Recurrence Rate: Results from a Nationwide Study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 3715
Publisher
MDPI AG
Online
2020-11-19
DOI
10.3390/jcm9113715
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The institutional learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study
- (2020) Kyung Jin Eoh et al. BMC CANCER
- Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer – A population-based study
- (2020) Pernille T. Jensen et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- The influence of learning curve of robot‐assisted laparoscopy on oncological outcomes in early‐stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study
- (2020) IGT Baeten et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer
- (2020) Luis Chiva et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
- Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1–IIA2 cervical cancer
- (2019) Se Ik Kim et al. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
- Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution
- (2019) David W. Doo et al. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
- Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
- (2019) Maria C. Cusimano et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study
- (2019) Emilia Alfonzo et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial
- (2019) Henrik Falconer et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
- Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff – a multicenter analysis
- (2019) Christhardt Köhler et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
- Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China
- (2019) Xiaopei Chao et al. BMJ Open
- Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea
- (2019) Se Ik Kim et al. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
- Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
- (2018) Gun Oh Chong et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
- Surgical approaches in women with endometrial cancer with a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2
- (2018) Rut M. Raventós-Tato et al. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
- Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
- (2018) Pedro T. Ramirez et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
- (2018) Alexander Melamed et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer
- (2016) B.M. Sert et al. EJSO
- Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications
- (2016) Peter C. Lim et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- Risk of Small Bowel Obstruction After Robot-Assisted vs Open Radical Prostatectomy
- (2016) Stacy Loeb et al. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
- A Detailed Analysis of the Learning Curve: Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer
- (2015) L Cao et al. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Beyond the Learning Curve of the Retzius-sparing Approach for Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncologic and Functional Results of the First 200 Patients with ≥1 Year of Follow-up
- (2013) Antonio Galfano et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution
- (2013) Ga Won Yim et al. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
- Postoperative Intestinal Obstruction after Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in the Pediatric Population: A 15-year Review
- (2009) F. Molinaro et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
- Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix
- (2009) Sergio Pecorelli et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- Postoperative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children: a 15-year experience
- (2009) Christos Kaselas et al. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
- What is the Learning Curve for Robotic Assisted Gynecologic Surgery?
- (2008) John P. Lenihan et al. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Classification of radical hysterectomy
- (2008) Denis Querleu et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started