4.6 Article

Assessing solution quality and computational performance in the hydro unit commitment problem considering different mathematical programming approaches

Journal

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 212-222

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2016.02.018

Keywords

Hydro unit commitment; Lagrangian relaxation; Mixed-integer nonlinear programming; Mixed-integer linear programming; Hydropower model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a comparative analysis of different mathematical programming approaches for optimizing the hydro unit commitment (HUC) problem with cascaded plants, multiple generating units, and a head-dependent hydropower model. Regarding the HUC problem related to this paper, the objective is to minimize the cascade outflow while satisfying all constraints, including a power target for each plant, in a day-ahead planning horizon. The decision variables are the on/off status of the units and the respective generation levels. Rigorously, the HUC is a mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem, and several strategies can be used to compute near-optimal solutions. In this paper, we are interested in accessing the solution quality, as well as the computational performance when the HUC problem is solved using the following mathematical programming approaches: (i) the Lagrangian relaxation that represents a decomposition technique that exploits the HUC modeling structure, (ii) a MINLP solver that can handle the size and the non-concavity of the problem, and (iii) a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) approach obtained by means of the hydropower model linearization. To perform the proposed analysis, numerical results are presented related to a real hydro system with eight cascaded reservoirs and 29 generating units. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available