4.7 Article

Saliva viral load better correlates with clinical and immunological profiles in children with coronavirus disease 2019

Journal

EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 235-241

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1878937

Keywords

COVID-19; children; saliva; immunological profiles; viral load

Funding

  1. Collaborative Research Fund 2020/21 and One-off CRF Coronavirus and Novel Infectious Diseases Research Exercises [C7149-20G]
  2. Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that saliva viral loads in pediatric COVID-19 patients correlated better with clinical and immunological profiles than nasopharyngeal swabs.
Background Pediatric COVID-19 studies exploring the relationships between NPS and saliva viral loads, clinical and immunological profiles are lacking. Methods Demographics, immunological profiles, nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), and saliva samples collected on admission, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were assessed in children below 18 years with COVID-19. Findings 91 patients were included between March and August 20 20. NPS and saliva viral loads were correlated (r = 0.315, p = 0.01). Symptomatic patients had significantly higher NPS and saliva viral loads than asymptomatic patients. Serial NPS and saliva viral load measurements showed that the log(10) NPS (r = -0.532, p < 0.001) and saliva (r = -0.417, p < 0.001) viral loads for all patients were inversely correlated with the days from symptom onset with statistical significance. Patients with cough, sputum, and headache had significantly higher saliva, but not NPS, viral loads. Higher saliva, but not NPS, viral loads were associated with total lymphopenia, CD3 and CD4 lymphopenia (all p < 0.05), and were inversely correlated with total lymphocyte (r = -0.43), CD3 (r = -0.55), CD4 (r = -0.60), CD8 (r = -0.41), B (r = -0.482), and NK (r = -0.416) lymphocyte counts (all p < 0.05). Interpretation Saliva viral loads on admission in children correlated better with clinical and immunological profiles than NPS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available