4.6 Article

Analysis of 220 Years of Floodplain Population Dynamics in the US at Different Spatial Scales

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13020141

Keywords

floodplains; human dynamics; flood damage; flood insurance; learning effect

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council FORMAS
  2. Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science, CNDS
  3. European Research Council (ERC) within the project HydroSocialExtremes: Uncovering the Mutual Shaping of Hydrological Extremes and Society [ERC Consolidator Grant] [771678]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different factors influence floodplain population dynamics at various spatial scales, from national to state and county levels, including factors such as population migration, flood damage, protection measures, and socio-economic factors.
In this study, we explore the long-term trends of floodplain population dynamics at different spatial scales in the contiguous United States (U.S.). We exploit different types of datasets from 1790-2010-i.e., decadal spatial distribution for the population density in the US, global floodplains dataset, large-scale data of flood occurrence and damage, and structural and nonstructural flood protection measures for the US. At the national level, we found that the population initially settled down within the floodplains and then spread across its territory over time. At the state level, we observed that flood damages and national protection measures might have contributed to a learning effect, which in turn, shaped the floodplain population dynamics over time. Finally, at the county level, other socio-economic factors such as local flood insurances, economic activities, and socio-political context may predominantly influence the dynamics. Our study shows that different influencing factors affect floodplain population dynamics at different spatial scales. These facts are crucial for a reliable development and implementation of flood risk management planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available