4.7 Review

Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting Technology and Its Applications for Tissue Engineering

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym12122958

Keywords

3D bioprinter; natural polymer; synthetic polymer; bio-ink; tissue engineering

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials - Korea government (MSIT) [NK224I]
  2. Chung-Ang University
  3. Technology Innovation Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [10067407]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10067407] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [NK224I] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology has emerged as a powerful biofabrication platform for tissue engineering because of its ability to engineer living cells and biomaterial-based 3D objects. Over the last few decades, droplet-based, extrusion-based, and laser-assisted bioprinters have been developed to fulfill certain requirements in terms of resolution, cell viability, cell density, etc. Simultaneously, various bio-inks based on natural-synthetic biomaterials have been developed and applied for successful tissue regeneration. To engineer more realistic artificial tissues/organs, mixtures of bio-inks with various recipes have also been developed. Taken together, this review describes the fundamental characteristics of the existing bioprinters and bio-inks that have been currently developed, followed by their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, various tissue engineering applications using 3D bioprinting are briefly introduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available