4.3 Article

New Perspective on Why Women Live Longer Than Men: An Exploration of Power, Gender, Social Determinants, and Capitals

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020661

Keywords

gender inequities; health inequities; life expectancy; social determinants; Ethiopia; Australia; power; Bourdieu; patriarchy

Funding

  1. NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Social Determinants of Health Equity (CRESDHE): policy research on the social determinants of health equity [APP 1,078,046]
  2. NHMRC [APP1176076]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the background and methods of gendered life expectancy difference globally, with case studies from Australia and Ethiopia illustrating the complex factors underlying this difference and the combination of social determinants of health lens and Bourdieu's capitals concept. The study confirms the existence of gendered life expectancy differences in all countries and proposes a theoretical framework for future research.
Background: Women live longer than men, even though many of the recognised social determinants of health are worse for women than men. No existing explanations account fully for these differences in life expectancy, although they do highlight the complexity and interaction of biological, social and health service factors. Methods: this paper is an exploratory explanation of gendered life expectancy difference (GLED) using a novel combination of epidemiological and sociological methods. We present the global picture of GLED. We then utilise a secondary data comparative case analysis offering explanations for GLED in Australia and Ethiopia. We combine a social determinant of health lens with Bourdieu's concepts of capitals (economic, cultural, symbolic and social). Results: we confirmed continuing GLED in all countries ranging from less than a year to over 11 years. The Australian and Ethiopian cases demonstrated the complex factors underpinning this difference, highlighting similarities and differences in socioeconomic and cultural factors and how they are gendered within and between the countries. Bourdieu's capitals enabled us to partially explain GLED and to develop a conceptual model of causal pathways. Conclusion: we demonstrate the value of combing a SDH and Bourdieu's capital lens to investigate GLED. We proposed a theoretical framework to guide future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available