4.7 Article

Habitat indicators for cavity-nesters: The polypore Phellinus pini in pine forests

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 275-280

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.003

Keywords

Heart decay fungi; Hole-nesting passerines; Pinus sylvestris; Snag; Tree cavity; Woodpecker

Funding

  1. Estonian Research Council [IUT34-7, ETF5091]
  2. State Forest Management Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Foresters and arborists have long used fruit-bodies of heart-rot fungi as signs of advanced live-tree decay, but such usage has not been elaborated for forest conservation. I analysed relationships between a heart rot fungus, tree-cavity supply, and cavity-nesting bird assemblage in wet hemiboreal Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) forests in Estonia. The focal species, Phellinus pini, is the main heartwood decayer of live pines; it typically forms fruit-bodies at the stage of advanced decay on old trees. I found that the pine wetlands had few tree-cavities (mostly in snags) and cavity-nesting birds (woodpeckers being almost absent) despite abundant snag supply. Only one fruit-body of P. pini was found on cavity-tree but stand-scale abundance of the fruit-bodies correlated well with cavity-nester densities. Multifactor models indicated that cavity formation, not tree death, was the limiting process for secondary cavity-nesters, and P. pini could indeed be used (in combination with old-pine abundance) for assessing their habitat quality. This fungus could also serve as an educational flagship species to bridge conservation biology and forest pathology, and its fruit-bodies can signal trees to be retained at harvesting in pine forests. The conclusion is that there is hope for developing practical indicators to manage for the hidden decay processes that govern tree-cavity development. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available