4.7 Article

Characterization and identification of lysine crotonylation sites based on machine learning method on both plant and mammalian

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77173-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Warshel Institute for Computational Biology, School of Life and Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong(Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070659]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lysine crotonylation (Kcr) is a type of protein post-translational modification (PTM), which plays important roles in a variety of cellular regulation and processes. Several methods have been proposed for the identification of crotonylation. However, most of these methods can predict efficiently only on histone or non-histone protein. Therefore, this work aims to give a more balanced performance in different species, here plant (non-histone) and mammalian (histone) are involved. SVM (support vector machine) and RF (random forest) were employed in this study. According to the results of cross-validations, the RF classifier based on EGAAC attribute achieved the best predictive performance which performs competitively good as existed methods, meanwhile more robust when dealing with imbalanced datasets. Moreover, an independent test was carried out, which compared the performance of this study and existed methods based on the same features or the same classifier. The classifiers of SVM and RF could achieve best performances with 92% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 90% accuracy, and an MCC of 0.80 in the mammalian dataset, and 77% sensitivity, 83% specificity, 70% accuracy and 0.54 MCC in a relatively small dataset of mammalian and a large-scaled plant dataset respectively. Moreover, a cross-species independent testing was also carried out in this study, which has proved the species diversity in plant and mammalian.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available