4.5 Review

IDH-Mutant Low-grade Glioma: Advances in Molecular Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions

Journal

CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-01006-6

Keywords

Astrocytoma; IDH mutant; Oligodendroglioma; CDKN2A; B; Imaging biomarker; PCV; Neurocognitive; Quality of life; Glioma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses updates in diagnosis and classification, imaging biomarkers, therapies, and outcomes for IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas. Recent findings suggest that CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion in IDH-mutant astrocytoma is associated with shorter survival, similar to WHO grade 4 tumors. Maximal safe resection is recommended for all LGG cases, and radiotherapy followed by PCV treatment provides longer overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone.
Purpose of Review IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas (LGG) have emerged as a distinct clinical and molecular entity with unique treatment considerations. Here, we review updates in IDH-mutant LGG diagnosis and classification, imaging biomarkers, therapies, and neurocognitive and patient-reported outcomes. Recent Findings CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion in IDH-mutant astrocytoma is associated with shorter survival, similar to WHO grade 4. The T2-FLAIR mismatch, a highly specific but insensitive sign, is diagnostic of IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Maximal safe resection is currently indicated in all LGG cases. Radiotherapy with subsequent PCV (procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine) provides longer overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone. Temozolomide in place of PCV is reasonable, but high-level evidence is still lacking. LGG adjuvant treatment has important quality of life and neurocognitive side effects that should be considered. Although incurable, IDH-mutant LGG have a favorable survival compared to IDH-WT glioma. Recent advances in molecular-based classification, imaging, and targeted therapies will hopefully improve survival and quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available