4.6 Article

Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics Exhibit Low Antiviral Activity against SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13010008

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; Covid-19; MERS; fluoroquinolones; antiviral; efficacy; ciprofloxacin; enoxacin; levofloxacin; moxifloxacin

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that fluoroquinolones at high concentrations have some inhibitory effects on the replication of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, with enoxacin showing the best results. Levofloxacin did not exhibit cellular toxicity in any cell type, while moxifloxacin showed toxicity at high concentrations in both cell types.
Repurposing FDA-approved drugs that treat respiratory infections caused by coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, could quickly provide much needed antiviral therapies. In the current study, the potency and cellular toxicity of four fluoroquinolones (enoxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin) were assessed in Vero cells and A549 cells engineered to overexpress ACE2, the SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor. All four fluoroquinolones suppressed SARS-CoV-2 replication at high micromolar concentrations in both cell types, with enoxacin demonstrating the lowest effective concentration 50 value (EC50) of 126.4 mu M in Vero cells. Enoxacin also suppressed the replication of MERS-CoV-2 in Vero cells at high micromolar concentrations. Cellular toxicity of levofloxacin was not found in either cell type. In Vero cells, minimal toxicity was observed following treatment with >= 37.5 mu M enoxacin and 600 mu M ciprofloxacin. Toxicity in both cell types was detected after moxifloxacin treatment of >= 300 mu M. In summary, these results suggest that the ability of fluoroquinolones to suppress SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV replication in cultured cells is limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available