Ball-on-flat linear reciprocating tests: Critical assessment of wear volume determination methods and suggested improvements for ASTM D7755 standard

This work presents a critical assessment of wear volume determination methods for ball-on-flat linear reciprocating sliding tribological tests. It revealed that the ASTM D7755-11 standard leads to the highest relative errors (up to 106%) and deviations (up to 27%) depending on the regularity of the wear track shape. The present study suggests improvements for the ASTM D7755-11 wear computation, which can reduce errors from 106% to 17% when analysing irregularly shaped wear tracks. In addition, a five-year period review of two relevant tribology journals revealed that the most used methods for wear determination, namely three-dimensional (3D) profilometry (46%) and nonstandard profile-based methods (36%), are overall reported with incomplete procedural information for wear computation. Furthermore, as many as 8% of the papers specify no data regarding the computation method and only 3% explicitly cited and followed the existing standards (ASTM D7755-11 or G13305). The present study highlights the importance of the correct selection, implementation, and reporting of wear volume computation method and quantifies the potential errors.

Automated summary

This study provides a critical assessment of wear volume determination methods for ball-on-flat linear reciprocating sliding tribological tests, highlighting the potential errors associated with the ASTM D7755-11 standard and the lack of complete procedural information in commonly used methods. The study also reveals a lack of explicit reporting of wear computation methods in the literature, emphasizing the importance of correct selection, implementation, and reporting of wear volume computation methods.