4.7 Article

Changes in Aesculus hippocastanum leaves during development of Cameraria ohridella

Journal

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126793

Keywords

Cameraria ohridella aetiology; Horse chestnut; Larvae and pupa morphology; Leaf morphoanatomy; Mine structure; Phenols

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland of the Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin [OKB/DS/8]
  2. Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin [BS-P-11-010-17-1-14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although Cameraria ohridella is a pest mining Aesculus hippocastanum leaves, has been known in Europe for 30 years, there is still no completely efficient method for control of this insect. The defence strategies of A. hippocastanum leaves against infestations by this pest have not been fully elucidated yet. The aim of the present study was to identify the defence strategy adopted by A. hippocastanum against the pest based on anatomical and histochemical analyses of leaves as well as to provide details of the morphology and behaviour of the developmental forms of C. ohridella. The study was carried out using a scanning, light, and fluorescence microscope. It was demonstrated that the response of the A. hippocastanum to C. ohridella larval infestations consisted in enhanced accumulation of phenolic compounds in tissues located at the border of mines and in the thickened layer of the leaf supporting the cocoon. Thorough analyses of the consecutive developmental stages of C. ohridella revealed new previously unknown features of larva L-1 and some details of the mandible structures of feeding larvae L-1-L-4 and the characteristics of the cocoon structure, which is produced by larvae L-5 and L-6. We have found six stages in the developmental cycle of this pest in the present study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available