4.7 Article

Field comparison of electrochemical gas sensor data correction algorithms for ambient air measurements

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 327, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128897

Keywords

Low-cost sensors; Electrochemical gas sensors; Air pollution measurements; Data correction algorithm evaluation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41605002, 41475004, 41827804, 21607056, 41805093]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, GIGCAS [SKLOG-201725]
  3. Special Fund Project for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy of Guangdong Province [2019B121205004]
  4. Huangpu District Regional International Science and Technology Cooperation Project [2018GH08]
  5. Pearl River Nova Program of Guangzhou [201710010006]
  6. Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR [016/2017/A1]
  7. Multi-Year Research Grant from the University of Macau [MYRG2017-00044-FST, MYRG2018-00006-FST]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study comprehensively evaluated data correction algorithms for electrochemical gas sensors using a large dataset from field comparisons. The performance of 8 different correction schemes was benchmarked, and recommendations on data correction scheme selection were provided based on the comparison results.
Electrochemical gas sensors (ECGS) have gained substantial popularity in ambient measurements. Several data correction algorithms had been proposed to tackle the drifting response of ECGS due to environmental factors, but there is a lack of performance evaluation of these data correction schemes. To fill this knowledge gap, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of these data correction algorithms using a large dataset from field comparisons. The dataset covered three commonly used gas pollutants, including CO, NO2 and O-3 measured by both ECGS and reference instruments, with a time resolution of 1 min and a duration of 6 months. Taking advantage of this large dataset, the performance of 8 different data correction schemes (2 new algorithms and 6 algorithms from the literature) was benchmarked by a set of evaluation metrics using raw signals from ECGS (nA level currents from the working and auxiliary electrodes). Eight scenarios were considered to examine the robustness of correction algorithms in response to different training and evaluation data period configurations. In addition, the bias dependence on temperature, RH, target gas levels and cross-sensitivity by different correction algorithms was investigated. Recommendations on data correction scheme selection are provided based on the comparison results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available