Effects of a time out consultation with the general practitioner on cancer treatment decision‐making: a randomised controlled trial
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Effects of a time out consultation with the general practitioner on cancer treatment decision‐making: a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2020-11-27
DOI
10.1002/pon.5604
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Continuity of care in general practice at cancer diagnosis (COOC-GP study): a national cohort study of 2853 patients
- (2019) Aline Hurtaud et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Off to a good start after a cancer diagnosis: implementation of a time out consultation in primary care before cancer treatment decision
- (2019) Eveline A. Noteboom et al. Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Randomised controlled trial protocol (GRIP study): examining the effect of involvement of a general practitioner and home care oncology nurse after a cancer diagnosis on patient reported outcomes and healthcare utilization
- (2018) I. A. A. Perfors et al. BMC CANCER
- The impact of comorbidity on cancer and its treatment
- (2016) Diana Sarfati et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Understanding the complexities of shared decision-making in cancer: a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients undergoing colorectal surgery
- (2016) Dhruvin H. Hirpara et al. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Breast and prostate cancer survivors’ experiences of patient-centered cancer follow-up care from primary care physicians and oncologists
- (2016) Shawna V. Hudson et al. Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review
- (2016) Judith A. Meiklejohn et al. Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- The expanding role of primary care in cancer control
- (2015) Greg Rubin et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Congruence between patients’ preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature
- (2014) Linda Brom et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- A randomised controlled trial to improve the role of the general practitioner in cancer rehabilitation: effect on patients’ satisfaction with their general practitioners
- (2013) Stinne Holm Bergholdt et al. BMJ Open
- Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
- (2012) Glyn Elwyn et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: A cross-over trial
- (2011) Heather L. Shepherd et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis
- (2011) Peter M. ten Klooster et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: An instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients
- (2010) Juan Ignacio Arraras et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Representation of Cancer in the Medical Literature - A Bibliometric Analysis
- (2010) Ronan W. Glynn et al. PLoS One
- The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample
- (2009) Levente Kriston et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started