4.5 Article

Polyetheretherketone implant surface functionalization technologies and the need for a transparent quality evaluation system

Journal

POLYMER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 70, Issue 8, Pages 1002-1015

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pi.6162

Keywords

bone implant; polyetheretherketone (PEEK); surface functionalization; quality evaluation; safety and performance evidence level (SPEL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Successful bone implants rely on good bone-implant contact, with different surface functionalization technologies playing a crucial role in their performance and safety. However, the lack of unified quality standards for surface-functionalized bone implants highlights the necessity of establishing a transparent quality evaluation system for the field.
For bone implants, osseointegration resulting in a good and fast bone-implant contact is of primary importance to secure a proper implant function and to avoid implant loosening or inflammation resulting in necessary revision surgeries causing pain to the patients and immense costs. In particular, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a promising implant material due to the close mechanical properties to bone, but it is entirely bio-inert, hindering osseointegration and making surface functionalization necessary. Many different surface functionalization technologies have been reported of both physical and chemical nature. The same is true for the other prominent implant materials titanium and ceramics. Although they already have inherently better osseointegration than PEEK, they are much harder and stiffer than bone and brittle in the case of ceramics. Surface functionalization, which can be subdivided into surface coating and material modification, needs to be judged from a quality and safety viewpoint. However, a literature research resulted in the realization that no quality standard yet exists for implant surface functionalizations. This makes it difficult to near impossible to compare the safety and performance of different surface-functionalized bone implants, clearly showing the need to establish a transparent quality evaluation system for bone implants. This perspective article gives the state of the art and then develops a quality evaluation system based on six main categories as important benchmarks for the quality of surface-functionalized bone implant materials. A simple catalog of questions can be answered, and from the resulting scores the Safety and Performance Evidence Level (SPEL) representing the safety and quality of a given implant can be calculated as a percentage. This simple SPEL system allows an easy and transparent judgment and comparison of bone implants, ensuring the easy identification of safe and well-performing high-quality bone implants in the future. (c) 2020 The Authors. Polymer International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available