4.7 Article

Systematic development of optimized SNEDDS of artemether with improved biopharmaceutical and antimalarial potential

Journal

DRUG DELIVERY
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 3209-3223

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2016.1162876

Keywords

Absorption; parasitemia; nanoemulsion; quality by design; solubility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current studies entail systematic development of self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) containing medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs) and long-chain triglycerides (LCTs) for augmenting the biopharmaceutical performance of artemether. Equilibrium solubility and pseudoternary phase diagram studies facilitated selection of Captex 355 and Ethyl oleate as MCTs and LCTs, and Cremophor RH 40 and Tween 80 as surfactants, while Transcutol HP as cosolvent for formulating the SNEDDS. Systematic optimization was performed employing the Box-Behnken design taking concentrations of lipid, surfactant and cosolvent as the critical material attributes (CMAs), while evaluating for globule size, emulsification time, dissolution efficiency and permeation as the critical quality attributes (CQAs). In situ single pass intestinal perfusion (SPIP) studies in Wistar rats substantiated significant augmentation in the absorption (5- to 6-fold) and permeation (4- to 5-fold) parameters from the optimized MCT and LCT-SNEDDS vis-a-vis the pure drug. In vivo pharmacodynamic studies in Plasmodium berghi infected laca mice exhibited superior reduction in the levels of percent parasitemia, SGOT, SGPT and bilirubin, followed by higher survival rate of the animals by optimized MCT-SNEDDS followed by LCT-SNEDDS vis-a-vis the pure drug, which was subsequently ratified through histopathological examination of liver tissues. Overall, the studies construed successful development of the optimized SNEDDS of artemether with distinctly improved biopharmaceutical and antimalarial potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available