4.1 Article

Placenta Pathology From Term Born Neonates With Normal or Adverse Outcome

Journal

PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 121-130

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1093526620980608

Keywords

placenta; placenta histology; umbilical cord; perinatal term morbidity; perinatal term mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that multiple placental abnormalities are significantly more common in placentas from term neonates with severe perinatal morbidity and mortality, including low weight, inadequate villous formation, hypercoiling, severe chronic villitis, and chorioamnionitis.
Background The incidence of umbilical cord or placental parenchyma abnormalities associated with mortality or morbidity of term infants is lacking. Methods Placentas of 55 antepartum stillbirths (APD), 21 intrapartum stillbirths (IPD), 12 neonatal deaths (ND), and 80 admissions to a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit (NS) were studied and compared with 439 placentas from neonates from normal term pregnancies and normal outcome after vaginal delivery (NPVD) and with 105 placentas after an elective caesarian sections (NPEC). Results NPVD and NPEC placentas showed no or one abnormality in 70% and placentas from stillbirth showed two or more abnormalities in 80% of cases. APD placentas more frequently had a low weight and less formation of terminal villi. Hypercoiling was more often present in all study groups. Severe chronic villitis was almost exclusively present in APD placentas. Chorioamnionitis was significantly more frequent in APD, IPD and NS placentas and funisitis was more often observed in IPD and NS placentas. Conclusion Multiple placental abnormalities are significantly more frequent in placentas from term neonates with severe perinatal morbidity and mortality. These placental abnormalities are thought to be associated with disturbed oxygen transfer or with inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available