4.3 Review

Preparation and Applications of Carbon-Based Fluorescent Nanothermometers

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.202000261

Keywords

carbon‐ based materials; temperature response; fluorescent nanothermometers

Funding

  1. Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan [20180201060SF]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [2018YFC1706603]
  3. Foundation Project of Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan [202002055JC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon-based fluorescent nanomaterials have rapidly developed in biology and biomedicine due to their high optical absorptivity, adjustable fluorescent emission, chemical stability, biocompatibility, and low toxicity. The review focuses on discussing the types, preparation methods, and future development directions of carbon-based fluorescent nanothermometers, providing guidance for their design and application.
In recent years, carbon-based fluorescent nanomaterials have been developed rapidly in biology and biomedicine due to their high optical absorptivity, adjustable fluorescent emission, chemical stability, well biocompatibility, and low toxicity. Their applications in temperature sensing have become one of the research hotspots. In this review, the authors summarize and sort out the carbon-based fluorescent nanothermometers in the following work: 1) the types and temperature-response mechanism of carbon-based fluorescent nanomaterials are discussed; 2) the preparation methods of colorimetric fluorescent carbon-based thermometers are introduced; 3) the applications of single/double emission carbon-based fluorescent nanothermometers have been focused on. Finally, the authors give their own views on the future development direction of carbon-based fluorescent nanothermometers. This review can provide guidance for the design and application of novel carbon-based fluorescent nanothermometers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available