4.6 Article

TARDB-Net: triple-attention guided residual dense and BiLSTM networks for hyperspectral image classification

Journal

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 80, Issue 7, Pages 11291-11312

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-10188-x

Keywords

Triple-attention mechanism; Hyperspectral image; Residual and dense networks; Bi-directional long-short term memory networks

Funding

  1. Hunan Key Laboratory of Intelligent Logistics Technology [2019TP1015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The method introduces a Triple-attention Guided Residual Dense and BiLSTM network (TARDB-Net) to improve hyperspectral image classification by feature selection and fusion. Experiments on three hyperspectral datasets demonstrate that the method achieves higher classification accuracy under low training samples compared to other methods.
Each sample in the hyperspectral remote sensing image has high-dimensional features and contains rich spatial and spectral information, which greatly increases the difficulty of feature selection and mining. In view of these difficulties, we propose a novel Triple-attention Guided Residual Dense and BiLSTM networks(TARDB-Net) to reduce redundant features while increasing feature fusion capabilities, which ultimately improves the ability to classify hyperspectral images. First, a novel Triple-attention mechanism is proposed to assign different weights to each feature. Then, the residual network is used to perform the residual operation on the features, and the initial features of the multiple residual blocks and the generated deep residual features are intensively fused, retaining a host number of prior features. And use the bidirectional long short-term memory network to integrate the contextual semantics of deep fusion features. Finally, the classification task is completed by Softmax classifier. Experiments on three hyperspectral datasets-Indian Pines, University of Pavia, and Salinas-show that under 10% of the training samples, the overall accuracy of our method is 87%, 96% and 96%, which is superior to several well-known methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available