4.6 Article

LPS Preconditioning Attenuates Apoptosis Mechanism by Inhibiting NF-κB and Caspase-3 Activity: TLR4 Pre-activation in the Signaling Pathway of LPS-Induced Neuroprotection

Journal

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 2407-2422

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-020-02227-3

Keywords

Neuroinflammation; LPS preconditioning; Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4); Apoptosis; Neuroprotection

Categories

Funding

  1. High Impact Research (HIR) [UM.C/625/1/HIR/172, PG123-2014B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroinflammation plays a key role in the progression of various neurodegenerative diseases, and recent studies have shown that LPS preconditioning provides neuroprotection by activating TLR4. Pre-exposure to low dose of LPS can confer a protective state against cellular apoptosis, indicating a role for TLR4 pre-activation in the signaling pathway of LPS-induced neuroprotection.
Neuroinflammation, an inflammatory response within the nervous system, has been shown to be implicated in the progression of various neurodegenerative diseases. Recent in vivo studies showed that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) preconditioning provides neuroprotection by activating Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), one of the members for pattern recognition receptor (PRR) family that play critical role in host response to tissue injury, infection, and inflammation. Pre-exposure to low dose of LPS could confer a protective state against cellular apoptosis following subsequent stimulation with LPS at higher concentration, suggesting a role for TLR4 pre-activation in the signaling pathway of LPS-induced neuroprotection. However, the precise molecular mechanism associated with this protective effect is not well understood. In this article, we provide an overall review of the current state of our knowledge about LPS preconditioning in attenuating apoptosis mechanism and conferring neuroprotection via TLR4 signaling pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available