4.5 Article

Comparison of polyurethane foam dressing and hydrocolloid dressing in patients with pressure ulcers A randomized controlled trial protocol

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024165

Keywords

hydrocolloid dressing; polyurethane foam dressing; pressure ulcer; protocol

Funding

  1. Medical and health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province [2020KY772]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study protocol compares the effects of hydrocolloid dressing and polyurethane foam dressing on PU patients, focusing on healing rates and cost-effectiveness. The study has strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, providing evidence-based support for optimal dressing selection for PU patients.
Background: We conduct this randomized controlled trial protocol for the comparison of the influence of the hydrocolloid dressing and polyurethane foam dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers (PUs) patients. Methods: This study will be implemented from February 2021 to February 2022 at Hangzhou Geriatric Hospital. The experiment was granted through the Research Ethics Committee of Hangzhou Geriatric Hospital (C5259033). Criteria for inclusion: patients older than 18 years of age who have been diagnosed with PU. If the patient suffers from more than a PU, only the ulcer with largest diameter is evaluated. Criteria for exclusion: (1) hypersensitivity or allergy to the substances in dressings; (2) patients with diabetic foot or venous ulcers; and (3) serious disease. The major result is rate of PU healing or ulcer epithelialization tissue. The secondary result is the changes in the area of ulcer in cm and cost-effectiveness. The analysis of all the data are conducted with the software of IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results: Table 1 will show the comparison of clinical outcomes between 2 groups. Conclusion: This study can develop an evidence-based protocol to identify optimal dressings for patients with PUs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available