4.7 Article

Changes in agriculture-biodiversity trade-offs in relation to landscape context in the Argentine Chaco

Journal

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 703-719

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-020-01155-w

Keywords

Agricultural production; Contagion index; Landscape composition; Land sparing vs; land sharing; Vertebrate richness; Yields

Funding

  1. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnologia de la Universidad Nacional de Cordoba, Argentina (SECyT-UNC) [313-16, 455-2018, 472-2018]
  2. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [031B0034A]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [KU 2458/5-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the Gran Chaco region of Argentina, the trade-offs between agriculture and biodiversity vary depending on landscape configuration. Biodiversity was highest in mixed landscapes where agricultural and natural areas are interspersed, while agricultural yields showed a more heterogeneous response.
Context Better balancing agricultural production and biodiversity conservation is a central goal for many landscapes. Yet, empirical work on how to best achieve such a balance has focused mainly on the local scale, thereby disregarding that landscape context might mediate biodiversity-agriculture trade-offs. Objectives Focusing on vertebrates in the Argentine Chaco, we evaluate how trade-offs between agriculture and biodiversity vary with landscape context, from landscapes where agricultural and natural areas are separated to landscapes where both are interspersed. Methods We modelled the distributions of 226 vertebrates and use the resulting maps to describe the species richness of ecosystem-service providing guilds. We calculated three agricultural intensity metrics, and evaluated how both species richness and agricultural intensity vary along a gradient of landscape configuration, while controlling for landscape composition. Results Species richness and agricultural yields both varied with landscape configuration. Biodiversity was highest in mixed landscapes where agricultural and natural area are interspersed, whereas agricultural yields showed a more heterogeneous response, with some yield metrics highest in mixed and others in separated landscapes. As a result, agriculture/biodiversity trade-offs depended strongly on landscape configuration, irrespective of landscape composition. We also identified large areas with low vertebrate richness and agricultural yields, suggesting considerable potential for improving in at least one dimension. Conclusions Agriculture/biodiversity trade-offs varied with landscape configuration, suggesting that landscape design can balance these trade-offs. Our simple and broadly applicable approach can provide baseline information for landscape planning aimed at realizing co-benefits between agriculture and biodiversity-in the Gran Chaco and elsewhere.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available