4.4 Article

Applying an ecological framework to understand transition pathways to post-secondary education for youth with physical disabilities

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 277-286

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1250171

Keywords

Qualitative; vocational rehabilitation; transitions

Categories

Funding

  1. Center for Leadership in Participation and Inclusion, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
  2. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of youth with physical disabilities and clinicians who support them in their transition to post-secondary education (PSE). Most research on transition to PSE has focused on youth with intellectual disabilities while there is a lack of research on youth with physical disabilities. Methods: This study drew on 30 interviews with 20 youth with disabilities and 10 clinicians. We used Bronfrenbrenner's ecological framework to inform our analysis. Results: Our results showed that there are several important individual skills that youth need to be successful in transitioning to PSE. Youth with disabilities experienced supports from peers and family that influence their transition to PSE. Several disability-specific issues (e.g., coping, self-care, disclosure, and accommodations) were often a barrier to transitioning to PSE. Clinicians and youth both reported that improved inter-professional collaboration and inter-agency partnerships were needed to enhance the transition experience. Societal attitudes (stigma and discrimination), policies, and the timing of transitions also influence youth's transition. Conclusion: Applying an ecological approach helped to provide a more holistic perspective of the PSE transitions and emphasizes the need to consider more than just preparing individuals but also where they are transitioned.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available