Journal
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 39, Issue 9, Pages 969-978Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1851933
Keywords
Swimming; metabolomics; periodization
Categories
Funding
- Ministere des sports
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that metabolic responses differed between the polarised training group and threshold training group during high-intensity threshold training loads, with the threshold group showing higher glycogenic depletion and inflammation levels, while the polarised group exhibited lower levels of these reactions.
The objective was to compare the metabolic responses of high-level national swimmers to threshold or polarised training. 22 swimmers (n = 12 males and 10 females) participated in a 28-week cross-over intervention study consisting of 2 x 6 period weeks of training. Swimmers were assigned randomly to either training group for the first period: polarised (POL) (81% in energetic zone 1: blood lactate [La]b <= 2 mmol.L-1; 4% in zone 2: 2 mmol.L-1 4 mmol.L-1) or threshold (THR) (65%/25%/10%). Before and after each training period, urine samples were collected for non-targeted metabolomics analysis. Mixed model analysis was performed on metabolomics data including fatigue class factors and/or training and/or interaction. Ion intensities of 6-keto-decanoylcarnitine (+31%), pregnanediol-3-glucuronide (+81%), P-cresol sulphate (+18%) were higher in the threshold group (P < 0.05) indicating higher glycogenic depletion and inflammation without alteration of the neuroendocrine stress axis. 4-phenylbutanic acid sulphate was 200% higher in less fatigued swimmers (P < 0.01) linking the anti-inflammatory activity at the cell membrane level to the subjective perception of fatigue. This research suggests the importance of replenishing glycogen stores and reducing inflammation during high thresholds training loads.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available