4.6 Review

Effects of high-intensity interval training in men soccer player's physical fitness: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized-controlled and non-controlled trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 39, Issue 11, Pages 1202-1222

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1863644

Keywords

Football; athletic performance; interval training; sprint interval training

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [FCT/MCTES]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [EU] [UIDB/50008/2020]
  3. Spanish government (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Programa Estatal de Generacion de Conocimiento y Fortalecimiento Cientifico y Tecnologico del Sistema I+D+i) [PGC2018098742-B-C31, SPGC201800X098742CV0]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UIDB/50008/2020] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has significant positive effects on aerobic fitness, repeated sprint ability, and vertical jump height for male soccer players. The type of HIIT does not seem to affect these outcomes significantly.
This systematic review with meta-analysis (SRMA) was conducted to assess the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) programmes on men soccer players' aerobic fitness (maximal oxygen uptake and aerobic performance), repeated sprint ability (RSA), vertical jump height (VJH), and linear sprinting time (ST). An electronic search yielded 1,714 articles, 33 of which were included in the present study. Meta-analyses revealed significant benefits of HIIT compared to controls in maximal oxygen uptake (p = 0.018), AP (p = 0.041), and RSA (p = 0.049). No significant effects were found in terms of ST (p = 0.080). The meta-analyses of non-controlled studies revealed significant improvements after HIIT in maximal oxygen uptake (p = 0.001), AP (p = 0.007), RSA (p = 0.001), and ST (p < 0.001). However, no significant improvements in VHJ were found (p = 0.063). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in sub-group analysis (comparisons between HIIT types). In conclusion, HIIT is effective for improving maximal oxygen uptake, AP, and RSA regardless of the HIIT type. For VHJ and ST outcomes, it seems reasonable to complement the HIIT since it might not be enough to achieve significant changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available